SolarSimPro

Looking for a HelioScope alternative? Look for the difference at the end of the workflow

HelioScope is a browser-based photovoltaic design tool widely used on commercial rooftop and ground-mount projects, known for fast layouts, single-line diagrams and shading analysis. SolarSimPro also runs in the browser, but carries the workflow a step further: the bill of materials, cost, feasibility and setting-out plan all come from the same model.

Runs in your browser Feasibility included Setting-out DXF

What determines how many modules fit?

What they share: the browser

Neither needs installation, and a team can reach the same project from different machines. Version and licence-key administration disappears.

Feasibility and cash flow

SolarSimPro produces payback, NPV and IRR from the consumption profile, tariff and net metering; the investment figure comes from the bill of materials.

Setting-out and CAD output

Setting-out plan DXF, coordinate lists and KMZ are produced directly; the file handed to the site team comes from the same model as the design.

The ground-mount side

Parcel lookup, slope and aspect analysis, inter-row shading distance and elevation tracking are part of the ground-mount workflow.

Where each tool sits in the workflow

HelioScope is an established tool for getting fast results on the design and yield side, and it is strong in that area.

SolarSimPro covers the same steps but also takes in the quotation and delivery side: bill of materials, line-by-line cost, feasibility and CAD outputs. The distinction is not in a feature list but in where the workflow ends.

When does switching make sense?

If you design in one tool, keep costs in a separate spreadsheet and the quotation in another document, the manual transfer between them costs time and introduces errors. Bringing it into one model removes that loss.

If, on the other hand, all you need is detailed yield modelling, staying with your current tool is reasonable; the two can also be used together.

The steps SolarSimPro covers

How to run the comparison

Rebuilding a completed project on the same assumptions gives you an answer faster than reading a feature list.

  1. Pick a finished projectA delivered site whose outcome you already know is the best basis for comparison.
  2. Rebuild the siteDraw the roof outline or fetch the parcel; keep the obstacles and module model identical.
  3. Match the assumptionsSet the loss items, module tilt and tariff values to match your existing study.
  4. Compare the yieldPut module count, annual yield and shading loss side by side.
  5. Look at the deliverablesJudge whether the bill of materials, cost summary, feasibility and DXF output are sufficient for delivery.

Frequently asked questions

Can SolarSimPro replace HelioScope?

If you want the proposal cycle in a single workflow, yes: drawing, layout, shading, yield, cost, feasibility and CAD output all come from the same model. If your need is only the design and yield side, you can stay with your current tool; the two can also be used together.

Does it produce a feasibility report?

Yes. Net metering is calculated from the consumption profile and tariff; payback period, net present value and internal rate of return come from the same model and export as a client-ready report.

What does it offer on ground-mount projects?

Land registry parcel lookup, slope and aspect analysis, layout driven by inter-row shading distance, tables following ground elevation, and 3D KMZ output.

Is there a trial?

There is. Register and request a demo; once approved, your time starts the moment you first open the application.

Compare it on your own project

Rebuild a finished site and put the deliverables side by side. Runs in the browser, no installation.

Related guides